Hi, Marshall,
Good questions. My understanding, as a layman relying on a variety
of sources, was based on a different theory of the mechanism of
action. One theory, supposedly based on dark field microscopy of
live blood, is that the Beck device and other blood electrification
methods work by improving the efficacy of white blood cells. The
related hypothesis is that these cells (macrophages I believe) work
not just by devouring the pathogens, in a Pac Man sort of attack, but
by first electrocuting the invaders! I think this concept derived
from the work of Gaston Naessens.
I do not know which theory is correct. You know a lot about the DNA
theory, which I do not know well.
Perhaps other list members have ideas.
My own experiences leave me with no reason to favor one hypothesis
over the other at the moment.
JBB
On Monday, Oct 27, 2003, at 23:21 Asia/Tokyo, Marshall Dudley wrote:
"Jonathan B. Britten" wrote:
Hi, Richard,
Soon SOTA will support only the Beck Pulser. They will drop the
Clarke
Zapper.
You have gotten one of the last Clarke Zappers to be sold by SOTA.
They now offer a second device for half price if you buy one.
They sell both Beck and Clarke devices at present. Your device is a
Clarke Zapper, which is not related to Beck's protocol. It puts out
12 volts as opposed to 31 volts. Both devices use 9 volt batteries.
Everyone I know uses the Clark Zapper in place of the Beck device when
doing
the beck protocol, and have had very good success with it.
I am glad if the Clarke Zapper works for you.
I think the Beck Pulser (blood electrification) protocol is more
plausible, but I have no direct experience with either device. I
use
a TENS device (Omron) to experiment with blood electrification.
Why do you say it is more plausible? As far as I can tell they work
exactly
the same way.
They both do the same thing:
1. Send a fast rise time pulse of current through the body.
2. This fast rise time pulse causes the dna of pathogens to ring at
their
resonance, causing them to break apart. (This is like a lightning bolt
causing static on a AM radio. The radio picks up across all
frequencies
since they are in the fourier transform of the pulse).
3. The pulse does not break apart the human dna because there is so
much of
it, there is insufficient power at the resonant frequency of human dna
to
affect it.
4. There is an electric field to cause the dna to pull apart once it is
broken. This can be in the form of an average electric field in the
Clark
zapper, or by using a pulse width of milliseconds for the Beck Device.
Without the field, the dna repairs itself with no lasting damage.
Now the Beck device switches 100 times a second if I remember right
and has
no offset. The leading edge breaks apart the dna and the the long
pulse
provides the field to pull the dna apart sufficiently so it cannot
recombine.
The Clark device pulses 30,000 times a second. If the pulses had an
average
value of 0, that is if they were bipolar, then the dna would split
apart,
then recombine, accomplishing nothing. But the pulse is unipolar (and
thus
has a 4.5 volt average value), which provides the electric field to
pull the
dna fragments apart.
Each has it's own advantages and disadvantages.
Clark Zapper
Advantages, 30,000 hits a second for more shaking of the dna and more
pumping
of the resonance.
It does not cause the blood cells to open causing the potential for
poisoning
with toxins in the body
Disadvantages
Discrete frequencies in the fourier are every 30,000 hertz, which may
fall
outside of a pathogen's resonance sufficiently to not couple well
Beck device
Advantages - Discrete frequencies are every 100 cycles, so you are
always
within 50 htz of a resonance for better coupling.
Disadvantages - frequency is so low that there is little likelihood of
resonance pumping, that is one pulse does not add to the ringing from
the
previous pulse.
Causes blood electrophoriation (sp? not in my dictionary).
So I am wondering, on what basis you you base your statement on that
the Beck
device is more plausible?
Marshall
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal
silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
