A resonant or sympathetic frequency and a generated or emitted frequency ain't the same things. The main difference is in where the energy comes from. The origial post had to do with people and plants etc having some sort of frequency as measured by some device, but didn't mention that it was a resonant frequency being measured with the original energy emitted by some other device. Was it or wasn't it?
In the case of auras being shown by x rays, that may be a resonant effect rather than a photo of an aura which may or may not have anything to do with an aura. Resonant with what? is the question. Ode At 11:29 AM 8/15/2004 -0400, you wrote: >...there is no way a signal can come from the >body... > >The problem with this statement is in a narrow >definition of the words, *signal* and *frequency*. >Royal Rife declared that all organisms had a specific >frequency that they operated at (or existed at). By >bombarding and overloading that organism (is this >case, specific types of pathogens) with a strong >signal set at that pathogens frequency, what Rife >called a sympathetic vibratory response would occur, >and that particular pathogen would, essentially, >vibrate to pieces. Live blood cell microscopy has >demonstrated Dr. Rifes assertion. > >There is the well-known phenomenon of shattering a >wine glass using a strong audio signal set at a >specific frequency. What determines what frequency it >takes to shatter a wine glass? The frequency that >glass, or even that particular glass, exists at and >responds to. > >Dr. Carey Reams asserted that all objects in the >universe operated at specific frequencies, living or >inanimate. He said that each organ in the body, and >each food that we eat, have their own frequency. In >this case, frequency is referring to molecular >oscillations, how many times electrons rotate around >the nucleus of each molecule, the combined, >sympathetic frequencies of all the molecules in an >organ or food or object, etc. To say that the body or >foods do not emit a signal is to assume that all >signals are measurable or even known. As far as these >devices that are being sold as measuring instruments, >I cannot say. If they are claiming to measure known >phenomena (radio waves, etc.), and no one else can >duplicate these measurements, then that is suspect. To >say that living organisms do not emit a signal of any >kind, I would have to disagree. > >Terry Chamberlin > > >______________________________________________________________________ >Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca > > >-- >The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > >Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > >To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com >Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com >OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > >
