CS>signals and frequencies
From: Terry Chamberlin
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 08:33:24
>> ...there is no way a signal can come from the body...
> The problem with this statement is in a narrow definition of the
> words, *signal* and *frequency*.
Hi Terry,
Everyone seems to be taking a narrow interpretation of what I said.
Here is my statement
"There is no measurable radiation from the human body at these
frequencies. You cannot measure it with an antenna and spectrum
analyzer. I owned a HP 8568A spectrum analyzer for many years and
can absolutely guarantee there is no measurable radiation from the
human body at 50MHz. Or from bottles of oil, or lumps of soil."
...
"However, there is no way a signal can come from the body, as
Tainio claims. His BT3 instrument is a scam."
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m72409.html
Please do not attribute my words to other areas outside the topic we
were discussing, which is frequency measurement with the Tainio BT3
system.
An instrument that claims to measure signals produced by plants,
bottles of oil, lumps of soil, or the human body at the frequencies
and under the conditions described on his web site is a scam.
Best Wishes,
Mike Monett
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
