Ode Coyote wrote: > ## I don't recall any mention of using UV light one way or the other, but > since agyria is well known to be a photographic process, I can't imagine > that a frustrated researcher with an agenda wouldn't figure that out.
Where else have you seen it? I have never seen argyria referred to as a photographic process except by me in this group or papers I have written, and others in this group. Do other researchers share this view? Do you have any urls? Thanks, Marshall > > > Ode > > > >So, they did not use uv light in the protocl? > > > >> > >> To NOT know the role of UV light would be completely idiotic. > > > >Now I am confused, did they know/use uv light or not? The question is if > he used > >UV light, the protocol you gave above does not indicate any use of UV light. > > > >Marshall > > > > > >-- > >The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > > >Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] > >Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > >Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] > >OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > > > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.1 - Release Date: 5/2/2005 > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.1 - Release Date: 5/2/2005
