Hi Marshall,

Yes you need that much I use 4 of the 150 watt ones and it is jsut enough. the 
distance you are away from them has a lot to do with it. if you are right up 
near them they get very warm but when they are 2 feet away they are very 
pleasant and comfertable for long periods of time. dont confuse them with a 250 
watt heat lamp which will burn you up. But thats not Far infrared so there is a 
big difference in these Far infgrared heaters as far as wattage required. So I 
lay under 600 watts worth of them and I barely break a sweat. you dont need to 
sweat much to make FIR work in the body. It works even if you dont sweat.




Take care,
 V


> "M. G. Devour" wrote:

>> Jason asks:
>> > Are these 150 watt heaters suitable for human use? ... or would one
>> > truly need a 300 watt far infrared heater?

>> Two 150's side by side is going to be hard to distinguish from one 300.
>> <grin>


> But is 300 watts necessary?  That is a heck of a lot of power to be pumping
> into one's body, a person normally generates about 100 watts of heat, so
> that would increase their heat load by 300%.  The body would have to
> dissipate 4X as much as as normal, and if using it on an extremety could
> result in overheating or even cooking I would think.


>> One question worth asking is what kind of electromagnetic field do they
>> generate? If I put myself in a box with a bunch of these, how bad is
>> the bombardment?

> They generate far infrared.  It is similar to the radiation you feel coming
> off of a hot pan and will contain both far as well as near infrared.  Use
> of some cotton between it and your body will eliminate the near infrared
> (that has very little penetrating power), leaving the deep penetration far
> infrared.

> Refrigerators are being made with far infrared compartments for meat. They
> claim that the far infrared increases the nucleic acid in meat, making it
> maintain it's taste longer.  This could be a hint on what it does in the
> body as well.  Also there is a paper on pasturization using far infrared,
> which might mean it is capable of killing pathogens in the body as well:

> TI Far-infrared irradiation effect on pasteurization of bacteria on or
>  within wet-solid medium
> AU Hashimoto, Atsushi; Igarashi, Hideo; Shimizu, Masaru
> AF Tokyo Univ of Agriculture & Technology
> AC Tokyo
> AY Jpn
> SE J Chem Eng Jpn
> ST Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan
> SN 0021-9592
> CN JCEJAQ
> IG 0078972 ISL n 6 SD Dec VOL v 25 YR 1992
> AT (Author abstract) NR 9 Refs AB
> The present purpose is to study the influence of far-infrared
> irradiation on pasteurization of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus
> aureus on or within a model for wet-solid food. Agar medium was used
> as the food model. By determining the thermal resistances of the test
> bacteria, the pasteurization effect of far-infrared irradiation
> (radiative heating) was compared with that of hot-air heating
> (a conventional method) from the viewpoint of thermal death kinetics.
> It was found experimentally that far-infrared irradiation is more
> effective than hot-air heating for the test bacteria on the agar-plate.

> More information on FIR can be found here:
> http://www.chimachine4u.com/fir.html


> Marshall



> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

> To post, address your message to: [email protected]

> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

> The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>    


--