Robert Berger wrote:
> I suggested that you visit Hawkeye-Jensen,Inc. on google and look at > the in vitro test data. They made 20 PPM EIS and diluted it to 10 > PPM, 3 PPM, and 1 PPM. They did not publish the 1PPM data as they > sell 3PPM material. There is reason to believe that the 1 PPM was > superior to the 3 ppm. > > I never could find that company on the net, but found what appears to > be the test results you are referring to. According to those results > the 10 ppm is much better than the 3 ppm, and they do not list 1 ppm. > > http://www.se1.us/health/colloidal-silver/test3.html > > Here is the table: > > 3ppm 10ppm 20ppm 1.0% Germaben II > > E.Coli 130 <10 50 <10 > Aeruginosa 50 <10 10 <10 > Staph.Aureus 4,000 750 370 2,000 > C.Albicans 50 80 70 <10 > > So for all but C. Albicans the 10 or 20 ppm was the most effective. > > No where on that page do they indicate if the lower concentrations are > by dilution, or manufacture. > Please do not come back and say that in vitro testing is not valid. > It will merely expose your ignorance. > > Why would I do that? The protocol they used is identical to the > protocol I used when I had my tests run. The test was run in broth > which is valid, not agar agar, which is not. > > Marshall > > > > "Ole Bob" >
