As Joel Sherrill wrote: > rw[0x5f]= new RWSreg(this, status); > - rw[0x5e]= new RWReserved(this, 0x5e); > + rw[0x5e]= new RWSph(this, stack); // not really but benign
My only other idea would be to have a RWSphFake class instead, which by default behaves like RWSph but could throw a warning when being told to be really picky. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
