Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Joel Sherrill wrote:
rw[0x5f]= new RWSreg(this, status);
- rw[0x5e]= new RWReserved(this, 0x5e);
+ rw[0x5e]= new RWSph(this, stack); // not really but benign
My only other idea would be to have a RWSphFake class instead, which
by default behaves like RWSph but could throw a warning when being
told to be really picky.
Implemented as described.
Silenced with the existing -M option to silence
warnings about accesses to non-existent locations.
Thanks for explaining this.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[email protected] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
