Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:11:06PM +1000, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>> But in the final analysis, the AI would be able to be implemented as >> code in a general purpose language on a general purpose computer with > Absolutely not. Possibly, something like a silicon compiler > with billions to trillions asynchronous systems. Certainly not > your grandfather's computer. Eugene, my estimation of your intelligence just fell an order of magnitude. =\ >> sufficient storage. Any lack in efficiency of such an approach would >> eventually be overcome by brute force increase in processing speed. > No, there are physical limits. You have to go asynchronous OOP, and > fine-grained sea of gates. Even current approaches are 3d torus of nodes > of microkernel OS, soon with FPGAs & Co. WTF? I mean it, W T F ? you claim that uploads will run much faster than humans and then turn around and claim that exotic hardware will be required to run the generally intelligent version of "Hello Wold!". I really have to set the record straight about this. As soon as I stop obsessively searching for the best op-amp buffer for my stereo, I'll sit down and do some serious explaining. -- Opera: Sing it loud! :o( )>-< ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=7d7fb4d8
