On 2/17/08, Stathis Papaioannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In the final extrapolation of this idea it becomes clear that if any
> computation can be mapped onto any physical system, the physical
> system is superfluous and the computation resides in the mapping, an
> abstract mathematical object. This leads to the idea that all
> computations are actually implemented in a Platonic reality, and the
> universe we observe emerges from that Platonic reality, as per eg. Max
> Tegmark and in the article linked to by Matt Mahoney:

Can you clarify this? What do you mean by "any computation can be
mapped onto any physical system"? I take it to be uncontroversial that
computations are multiply realizable or can be implemented by
different physical substrates but I don't see how that's anywhere near
enough to establish the conclusions you want.

-------------------------------------------
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=96140713-a54b2b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to