Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > It was FQDN in RFC2327. Then, it became just IP4-address or IP6-address > in draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-02 and -03, but went back to FQDN in > draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-04. > > I don't know which is preferred for use with SIP. But it would be nice > if somebody would make up their mind.
I would find it disturbing if an application-layer protocol/data format only allows numeric IP addresses. Thus, to whoever is editing the SDP draft: having a layer of indirection is very helpful, for both unicast and multicast IP addresses. This also greatly simplifies IPv6 issues. -- Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
