Colin, I could have sworn we once had a conversation about why using domain names in SDP was a bad idea, and that this was the motivation for its removal from sdp-new, although I don't remember the reason. Am I mis-remembering (a definite possibility), or is there some issue with domain names?
-Jonathan R. Colin Perkins wrote: > --> Paul Kyzivat writes: > >>It was FQDN in RFC2327. Then, it became just IP4-address or IP6-address >>in draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-02 and -03, but went back to FQDN in >>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-04. >> >>I don't know which is preferred for use with SIP. But it would be nice >>if somebody would make up their mind. >> > > draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new is intended to match RFC2327. If it doesn't, > let > me know and I'll fix it. > > Colin > > -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Avenue Chief Scientist First Floor dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050 http://www.jdrosen.net PH: (973) 952-5000 http://www.dynamicsoft.com _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
