I don't recall the conversation, although that doesn't necessarily mean that it didn't happen :)
Colin --> Jonathan Rosenberg writes: >Colin, > >I could have sworn we once had a conversation about why using domain >names in SDP was a bad idea, and that this was the motivation for its >removal from sdp-new, although I don't remember the reason. Am I >mis-remembering (a definite possibility), or is there some issue with >domain names? > >-Jonathan R. > >Colin Perkins wrote: > >> --> Paul Kyzivat writes: >> >>>It was FQDN in RFC2327. Then, it became just IP4-address or IP6-address >>>in draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-02 and -03, but went back to FQDN in >>>draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-04. >>> >>>I don't know which is preferred for use with SIP. But it would be nice >>>if somebody would make up their mind. >>> >> >> draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new is intended to match RFC2327. If it doesn't, >> let >> me know and I'll fix it. >> >> Colin >> >> > > >-- >Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Avenue >Chief Scientist First Floor >dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050 >http://www.jdrosen.net PH: (973) 952-5000 >http://www.dynamicsoft.com > > >_______________________________________________ >mmusic mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
