Hi Adetye,

Thanks for pointing it. Yes, a BYE with CSeq 1 is perfectly valid in this case.
I think I need some coffee ...

- Ajit

Gupta Adetya-A19368 wrote:

> Ajit,
>         How does cseq in this case makes a difference.
>   The call was started by Helmsman's Agent.
>   Mariusz agent will have a different set of CSeq,
>   so BYE with CSeq of 1 is perfectly valid.
>
>   Mariusz, can u plz post the complete call log
>   at ur Agent side as well as at Helmsman's Agents side.
>   That would be more informative.
>
>
> regards
> -adetya
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ajit Kalele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:47 PM
> To: Mariusz Mas�owski
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Problem with BYE
>
> Hello Mariusz ,
>
> Its not very clear from your mail, as the INVITE - 200 - ACK details have
> not been given. But one reason that I could think of is "may be you are not
> incrementing the CSeq value in BYE". Your message details show it as "CSeq:
> 1 BYE", so unless your CSeq value is starting from 0 (zero), its hard to
> make out from the details given. May be a complete message flow would give
> an idea.
>
> Regards
> - Ajit
>
> Mariusz Mas�owski wrote:
>
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I'm writing a SIP User Agent and I have problem with terminating a
> > dialog with Ubiquity UA using BYE.
> >
> > My testing environment consists of my UA and Helmsman User Agent v 3.0.6
> > (http://www.ubiquity.net/useragent.php).
> > The tesing scenario is as follows:
> >    o Helmsman UA starts the dialog (INVITE)
> >    o My UA accepts the dialog (200 OK)
> >    o My UA terminates the dialgo (BYE)
> > First two steps are done correctly.  But as I send the BYE request it
> > does not receive a final response.  The Helmsman UA sends only a
> > provisional 100 Trying.
> > When I use another remote UA (josua --
> > http://www.fsf.org/software/osip/) the BYE gets a positive response (200
> > OK).
> >
> > Is there something wrong with the following message:
> >
> > BYE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
> > CALL-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FROM: "SIP AGENT" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=2076209524
> > TO: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=3836145980
> > CSEQ: 1 BYE
> > VIA: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.34:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1410491809
> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Mariusz Maslowski
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

*********************************************************
Disclaimer

This message (including any attachments) contains 
confidential information intended for a specific 
individual and purpose, and is protected by law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should 
delete this message and are hereby notified that 
any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, 
is strictly prohibited.

*********************************************************
Visit us at http://www.mahindrabt.com



_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to