[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You have my vote, Dale. This leaves me to wonder why SUBSCRIBE, the > only dialog creating request after INVITE leaves such a horrendous hole > in interpretation. I have a registrar/proxy implementation that > receives a gazillion NOTIFYs a minute with only 10 calls active and I > don't have the right to complain. > > If the things that receive the NOTIFYs are expecting them, I don't see > a problem. What is your situation? I think I've missed the details. > >
I am talking about unsolicited notifies without a corresponding SUBSCRIBE. There are user agents that uses NOTIFY request to keep NAT bindings. A popular IPBX sends MWI notifies right after receiving a registration without getting a subscription for message-summary. This practice is very common. Joegen _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
