I don't think in the IMS specification, 200 without Service-Route header is an valid case.
Peili 2007/9/3, Vikram Chhibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Depending on the implementation, option one is also correct as PCSCF > is considered as the outbound proxy whose address is not specified in > the Route header. > But the basic point is, if UE does not know the path to SCSCF, it can > send the message to its outbound proxy i.e. PCSCF which knows how to > forward the message to calling party home network. > > On 9/3/07, Goyal, Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > In IMS environment if we get 200 OK for REGISTER without Service-Route, > > Then what should be the Route set for out going INVITE ? > > > > > > > > 1. No Route > > > > OR > > > > 2 Route with only P-CSCF Address > > > > > > > > Or something else. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Amit > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
