Hi Peili, you should be right but can you point me to the spec. where
this is specified explicitly? Is there any 3gpp test suite behavior
for this case? I understand that 3gpp has defined behavior for PCSCF
when INVITE is received with Route headers and its validation, but
where have they specified the behavior when it's missing?
In general, should we go implementing a very strict compliant solution
or follow the SIP philosophy in  general of "Be lenient in what you
expect and strict in what you send?".

Thanks,
~Vikram

On 9/3/07, Peili Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think in the IMS specification, 200 without Service-Route
> header is an valid case.
>
> Peili
>
> 2007/9/3, Vikram Chhibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Depending on the implementation, option one is also correct as PCSCF
> > is considered as the outbound proxy whose address is not specified in
> > the Route header.
> > But the basic point is, if UE does not know the path to SCSCF, it can
> > send the message to its outbound proxy i.e. PCSCF which knows how to
> > forward the message to calling party home network.
> >
> > On 9/3/07, Goyal, Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In IMS environment if we get 200 OK for REGISTER without Service-Route,
> > > Then what should be the Route set for out going INVITE ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1.      No Route
> > >
> > >              OR
> > >
> > >      2 Route with only P-CSCF Address
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Or something else.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Amit
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to