This is certainly a valid approach, and I agree it is in general the
"best" way to indicate a phone number.
It is better than, e.g. a sip URI, because it is intentionally protocol
independent.
The only problem is getting people to use this approach.
Thanks,
Paul
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, it could be nice if web pages use an estandarized way to indicate
> telephone numbers and a link for use it.
>
> For this case, IMHO "tel" URI is perfect. An user visiting a web could click
> into a link like:
>
> tel:+12345678
>
> so him sofphone would generate a request:
>
> INVITE tel:+12345678 SIP/2.0
>
> Of course, for this to work the softphone needs to have set an outbound
> proxy,
> if not the softphone can't send the request.
>
> Is this feature used in this way? Ufortunatelly I don't see "tel:" links in
> web pages.
>
> PD: I see more "skype:" links than "tel:" or "sip:". :(
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
