El Viernes, 22 de Agosto de 2008, Paul Kyzivat escribió: > It is better than, e.g. a sip URI, because it is intentionally protocol > independent.
And because the lin in the web doesn't need to indicate a domain to send the request. > The only problem is getting people to use this approach. And the fact that usually softphones are not configured with outbound proxy. Maybe a solution would be that if a user types a "tel" URI into his phone, and the phone hasn't set an outbound proxy, then the phone should send the request to the domain it uses in normal SIP calls. This is, if the phone has configured the account: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with no outbound proxy set, and the user types "tel:1234", then the phone could send a request like: INVITE tel:1234 SIP/2.0 to "my_provider.com" (after doing NAPTR, SRV and so). What do you think about? Is it something liek this specified? Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
