2011/4/26 Worley, Dale R (Dale) <[email protected]>: > What is the reason? I know that in sipXecs, we've effectively removed the > 6xx responses > by adjusting the proxy to treat them in the same way as 4xx responses. > Everything works > better because of that. It seems to me that 6xx was *fundamentally* a > mistake, based on the > erroneous belief that a downstream element could have global knowledge of the > potential > destinations of a call.
I agree. The same feature (ignoring special treatment of 6XX responses) is optional in Kamailio and OpenSIPS SIP proxies. Thinks work better without 6XX. A cool example is when a proxy calls a user registered in two phones. Both phones ring but a person in one of them rejects the call and his phone generates a 603. The phone stops ringing in the second phone (which is undesirable in many cases). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
