RFC 3261 suggests "480 Temporarily Unavailable" is ok for "do not disturb".
For me declining manually is no different to declining automatically

Regards

Attila

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin P. 
Fleming
Sent: 26 April 2011 16:49
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Which response should a proxy reply if RURI 
domain doesn't exist?

On 04/26/2011 10:41 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
> ________________________________________
> From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [[email protected]]
>
> A cool example is when a proxy calls a user registered in two phones.
> Both phones ring but a person in one of them rejects the call and his 
> phone generates a 603. The phone stops ringing in the second phone 
> (which is undesirable in many cases).
> ________________________________________
>
> Yeah, Polycom phones have that problem.  That's why we modified sipXecs's 
> handling of 6xx.

What would be a better response code to return when the user of the phone has 
manually rejected/declined the call? '486 Busy Here' seems a bit inappropriate, 
although I guess it's not terrible.

--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: [email protected] | SIP: [email protected] | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at 
www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to