2011/5/12 Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>: > 2011/5/12 Olle E. Johansson <[email protected]>: >> Well, if I remember correctly (which may not be the case) RFC 3261 did not >> include these parameters. There was a document - draft or RFC - that did >> which caused me to add support for it to Asterisk years ago - somehow a >> Nortel system was causing this, because they where using it. > > Such parameters are included in BNF grammar o RFC 3261 (as Brett > poited out). However you can consider the SIP URI username as an > entire token. This is, by specification: > > sip:[email protected] != sip:alice;[email protected]
And of course, SIP URI user params should be removed from RFC 3261. I know about some servers that process NRN params in TEL URI and then, when converting the RURI to a SIP URI (for routing purposes for example) the add the TEL URI params as SIP URI params (rather than SIP URI user params). This is because most of the servers/gateways don't support parsing user params. Remove user params from RFC 3261. Your life will be much better. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
