Vijay K. Gurbani writes: > 2/ If we are endorsing "transport=dtls-udp" in a SIP URI, then > saying that you should not put "transport=tls" in a SIP URI > seems silly. (Note that I personally do not like how > implementations have continued to use "transport=tls" > despite rfc3261 deprecating this. But questions will arise > in the future that why are we allowing "transport=dtls-udp" > and not "transport=tls"?)
because that is what "we" (the god) decided. -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
