Richard Shockey wrote:
> If there is going to be a solution to the SIP identity > problem involving e164 numbers, it will not IMHO be > solved in the IETF. Please do not assume that the only path to E.164 enlightenment is ENUM. I have one proposal on the table, draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc, which does not use ENUM. My proposal may not be perfect, but it does not use ENUM. -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
