Oh of course, but you would not get an argument from me if you asserted that sure the path to damnation is through ENUM.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Wing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:04 PM > To: 'Richard Shockey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'IETF SIP List' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Sip] Infrastructure issues involving e164 numbers > > > > Richard Shockey wrote: > > > If there is going to be a solution to the SIP identity > > problem involving e164 numbers, it will not IMHO be > > solved in the IETF. > > Please do not assume that the only path to E.164 enlightenment is > ENUM. > > I have one proposal on the table, draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc, which > does not use ENUM. My proposal may not be perfect, but it does > not use ENUM. > > -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
