That works for me.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 19:24 > To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Cc: Jiri Kuthan; Rohan Mahy; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] keep-alive backwards compatibility in > draft-ietf-sip-outbound-12.txt > > > On Mar 6, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Francois Audet wrote: > > > Yeah, this is quite obscure (but I think Jiri's description > is overly > > complex). > > > > I *think* that what we should say somewhere is the following: > > > > - If this specification is supported by the registrar (as > per presence > > of the Require: outbound in the 200 response to the Registration, > > then the UAC MUST do keep-alives as per section X.Y. > > That can't be quite right. The registrar might support > keepalive, but the edge proxy might not. > > I believe Rohan's explanation indicated that the Require: > outbound would only be in the 200 OK response to REGISTER if > both the edge proxy and the registrar support it. > > > > So using your terminology: > > If this specification is supported by the UAC, the edge proxy (if > present) and the registrar, then there will be a Require: > outbound in the 200 response to the Registration indicating that > the UAC MUST do keep-alives as per section X.Y. > > -- > Dean > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
