Hi, I am NOT arguing against the fact that you can use CRLF without negotation. But, again, HOW does the edge proxy know that the UA actually will use CRLF? If it doesn't know, it may use short registration timer. So, why don't we say something like: "It is RECOMMENDED that the UA uses CRLF for TCP keep-alive even if the UA doesn't receive keep=true, unless the UA receives a registration refresh timer value which is equal or less than the UA's default keep-alive interval in which case the registration refreshes will act as keep-alives." I think that is what Juha proposed some e-mails ago. Regards, Christer
________________________________ Lähettäjä: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lähetetty: to 8.5.2008 9:28 Vastaanottaja: Jiri Kuthan Kopio: Christer Holmberg; Hadriel Kaplan; Francois Audet; [email protected] Aihe: Re: VS: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt Jiri Kuthan writes: > For which sake sending a CRLF seems perfectly sufficient to me, without > any additional negotiation stuff. jiri, thanks for your support. i forgot to mention that credit to openser's CRLF implementation belongs to your ser group. -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
