Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi, > >>> So, you are saying the following: if the UA does not support CRLF the >>> UA itself will include a short registration interval in the REGISTER >>> request? >> yes. >> >>> That is not standardized behavior either, and I am not sure that is how UAs >>> work. >> i didn't claim that it is standardized. it is simply a practical UA >> implementers way to solve the problem without yet another addition to sip >> protocol, which we sick of. > > I agree it's a prectial way, but is that how UAs work today? > > I am happy if we can do things without yet another addition to the protocol, > but doing things based on assumptions on how we THINK UAs should work isn't > going to be very useful.
Then let's standardize as a BCP that UAs send CRLF. > >>> "you can write that if registration interval would be as short as default >>> keepalive interval then it is not recommended to send keepalives." >> ok, looks like i tried something to make you happy, but i'll take that back, >> because the discussion has shown that nothing like that is >> needed. i repeat, if UA is using TCP, your draft should clearly say that >> the keep stuff is NOT used. > > If people agree that TCP is not a problem, I can remove it. I violently agree. -jiri > > Regards, > > Christer > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
