Personally, I'd like to see some coherent discussion around it in a WG
meeting then try to get to consensus on it. The totally number of
people bothering to follow the conversation at this point is extremely
low.
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
I asked:
> We've been batting INFO around for many, many years now (like, 10 --
> it predates the SIP working group). A couple of meetings back, we
> agreed that we would discuss use cases for INFO packages, and if we
> didn't find any consensus there, then we would go ahead and
publish an
> "INFO Considered Harmful" RFC.
>
> We tried having this discussion at the last IETF, but that just
didn't
> work out.
>
> Do we try again, or just give up and publish "INFO Considered
> Harmful"?
>
> Personally, I don't care anymore -- I just want to drive a stake
into
> the heart of this undead-thing, cut off its head, stuff the mouth
with
> holy wafers, and bury it at a crossroads somewhere.
>
> But this WG only slays by consensus, so what do you want?
Several people (Jonathan, Mary, Christer, Paul) have responded to the
list with various things that added up to "Publish INFO packages AND
document the extension models for SIP". So far, nobody has suggested
otherwise.
Does anybody want to do anything else? Speak now or forever visualize
whirled peas.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
