Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I'm with Eric on this. I worked for awhile and the results seemed > futile, so I'm not overly motivated to start again. But if there is some > possibility of reaching a conclusion then I'll join in. > > Certainly I agree with Martin that there are lots of deployments and > support for INFO in some form. But most of them are non-standard in one > way or another. And I think this leaves us in a Catch-22 situation: > > - we can just bless unrestricted use of INFO. But that would serve no > purpose, and wouldn't enhance interoperability. > > - or we can formalize rules for negotiating usages of INFO. That will > provide the potential of enhanced interop. But then all the existing > deployments will be incompatible with it.
That sounds like a vote for defaulting and publishing Eric's original "Why you shouldn't use INFO for anything" draft. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
