But now you are making the assumption that all info-packages require the
call to fail if I do not support the info package. 

By default, we must make the ordinary assumption we make for all
extensions, i.e. that we can discard the information if it is not
understood. 

regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 7:51 PM
> To: Hadriel Kaplan
> Cc: SIP List
> Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
> 
> 
> On Nov 21, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> >
> > All we have to do for vendor-proprietary users of INFO is make sure 
> > they interoperate with those of us who don't have them, by letting
> > them discover we don't support them. (which is what 
> recv-info does)   
> > We don't need to work to give them more features.
> >
> 
> But the caller can't get to the recv-info until it  does an 
> INVITE. I don't want to be getting INVITES for calls that are 
> going to have to be dropped because I don't do info-packages 
> at all. . .
> 
> --
> Dean
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip 
> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to