> -----Original Message----- > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 6:19 PM > > Hadriel wrote: > > > That is a different question than "should we have an > > info-package draft option tag". I'm fine with providing a > > way for non-standard uses of Foo to identify their > > non-standard Foo in Supported. But I guess that requires an > > update to 3261? > > I think you yourself have admitted that option-tags in Require headers > are overused (and abused). Therefore I believe if we relax the IANA > registration requirement for registering new ones, we also need to > address how we stop people putting them in Require headers when they do > not need to.
Which is why I carefully put the word "Supported" in my statement: "to identify their non-standard Foo in Supported". :) -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
