On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:55 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > Unfortunately I had to revert it for now since it was breaking several UI > tests (which just might mean that the tests were wrong). > Let's keep XCF-2910 till I have some time to review it and check those tests.
I re-applied it in my working copy, and it seems to have passed the unit tests. What errors do you see? I've attached the revised patch to XCF-2910 as patch2.diff. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
