> >Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Support for video for remote workers through NAT > >On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Robert Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Steinmann, Martin (BL60:2500) >>> >>> Does the new remote worker / NAT traversal feature support >>> video as e.g. provided by the Counterpath softphones? >> >> Yes it does handle traversal for both audio and video streams (and in >> any combination, i.e. Audio-only, Audio+Video and Video-only). > > >Unless there is demand for it ( i.e. say now if you feel this is a >limitation), the first release of sipxbridge will handle only audio >streams as the use case is primarily PSTN connectivity. Video stream >support will be added in subsequent releases. If an Audio + video >call is made through sipxbridge, only the audio portion of the all >setup will be handled. > >Regards, > >Ranga > This sounds good to me --martin
> _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
