Carolyn Beeton wrote: > I see that Scott has just created XECS-1857 to allow sipXconfig to query > what resources are missing. > > I had thought of providing a more general "getStatusMessage" query which > would return whatever info sipxsupervisor has collected (e.g. missing > resources, configtest errors, possibly even output during Running > phase). Does this sound reasonable? supervisor would return a list of > strings which sipXconfig could then display.
The problem with general status messages is that they are not localizable. But I think that most people would rather see them in English than not see them at all... > > Also, I thought I would have to package up the configtest in an xml-rpc > method so that sipXconfig could ask for it to be run. Is there an issue > for that? or should I just forget about it? (it has to run in parallel > with the existing state machine) > > Carolyn > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
