On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:43 -0500, Carolyn Beeton wrote: > I see that Scott has just created XECS-1857 to allow sipXconfig to > query what resources are missing. > > I had thought of providing a more general "getStatusMessage" query > which would return whatever info sipxsupervisor has collected (e.g. > missing resources, configtest errors, possibly even output during > Running phase). Does this sound reasonable? supervisor would return > a list of strings which sipXconfig could then display.
I think that interface for getting error reports from the processes is a good idea. My thought with respect to the resource list is that it be more structured data so that we would have some hope of building tools that use it. > Also, I thought I would have to package up the configtest in an > xml-rpc method so that sipXconfig could ask for it to be run. Is > there an issue for that? or should I just forget about it? (it has to > run in parallel with the existing state machine) I don't believe that there is an issue for that yet, but there should be. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
