Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 12:37 -0500, Dale Worley wrote:

Generally, allowing an alternative form of anything is increasing
complexity and will cause difficulties.  In this case, '+' is a
perfectly valid character for user-parts, and RFC 3261 specifies that
sip:+1...@domain is different from sip:1...@domain.

In regard to DIDs from ITSPs, one generally wants the ingress gateway to
translate the request-URI from whatever format the ITSP provides to the
form used internally within the sipX system.

I disagree - I think that you only want to modify addresses in the call
routing core (proxy/redirect servers).  Spreading those changes around
through a larger number of components makes debugging flows much more
difficult.
The subject usecase can be facilitated in two ways:
1. On the Devices-->SBCs-->Internal SBC-->SIP screen set up the "incoming call destination" as conference extension. (Now, this would */hard code/* the incoming call destination on the sipXbridge, thereby making all inbound calls through any ITSP, terminate at the conference extension)

2. Create a custom dial plan such as ( *Dialed number* 'Prefix' +19497776946 and 0 digits , *Resulting call*, 'Dial' 9497776946 and append 'Nothing' ) where 9497776946 is the bandwidth directory number (which can be assigned as Conference, ACD or Hunt group extension). (here any Incoming call arriving with a +19497776946 results in getting *re-routed* to 9497776946)

Other than these, we also have a bunch of testcases wherein we assign the Conference/ACD line/Hunt group extension as the ITSP directory (DID) number, so that when an outside caller dials the directory number, he directly reaches these extensions (without any re-routing). These set of testcases have already been tested with BT BBV and callwithus ITSP's without any issues . Since an Inbound call made using bandwidth.com reaches SCS as +19497776946 and +19497776946 cannot be assigned to any of the above extensions, these set of testcases will fail as far as bandwidth.com is concerned.
Thanks,
Chaitra

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to