Following up on Thursday's scrum: The current builds contain the
following RPM names (with some of the trailing version identifiers
removed):
sipxfreeswitch-4.1.0
sipx-freeswitch-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-codec-passthru-amr-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-codec-passthru-g723_1-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-codec-passthru-g729-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-devel-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-lang-en-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-lua-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-perl-1.0.4
sipx-freeswitch-spidermonkey-1.0.4
sipxopenfire-4.1.0
sipx-openfire-3.6.4-3
As you can see, there is considerable potential for confusion. I think
we need to revise our naming conventions to avoid having, e.g., two RPMs
whose basic names differ only by a hyphen. What would be a better
scheme?
Dale
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
