On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 16:23 -0500, Paul Mossman wrote: > Dale wrote: > ... > > That produces the following RPM names: > ... > > +1 > > Can we make sure the EDE Step #4 script (ede_build_devuser.sh) gets > updated in the same revision that applies these changes? > > The tricky part of that will be to "# Uninstall any old dependency > RPMs". This should look for the dependency RPMs by both their old and > new names.
The new spec files should Obsolete the old names; I think that will cause most install/upgrade operations to do the right thing. > Another option would be to only support the new names in the EDE script. > Then publish manual instructions for fixing existing environments, which > I think would not be EDE-specific. > > > -Paul > [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
