On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:31 -0500, Dale Worley wrote: > Following up on Thursday's scrum: The current builds contain the > following RPM names (with some of the trailing version identifiers > removed): > > sipxfreeswitch-4.1.0 > > sipx-freeswitch-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-codec-passthru-amr-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-codec-passthru-g723_1-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-codec-passthru-g729-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-devel-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-lang-en-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-lua-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-perl-1.0.4 > sipx-freeswitch-spidermonkey-1.0.4 > > sipxopenfire-4.1.0 > > sipx-openfire-3.6.4-3 > > As you can see, there is considerable potential for confusion. I think > we need to revise our naming conventions to avoid having, e.g., two RPMs > whose basic names differ only by a hyphen. What would be a better > scheme?
Perhaps when we create an rpm by building outside package foo, we should name it something like sipximport-foo, and then any additions to it from our own code base can be sipx-foo-<something-descriptive> _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
