Ranga wrote: > > In most cases the mapping is 1-1. In the few cases it > isn't 1-1, then > > the admin needs to enter the same ITSP credentials a couple > of extra > > times. Minor inconvenience. > > > I guess it is fine. Not the design I would prefer but we can > revisit the GUI issue later.
Agreed then. We'll park it for now. > > Yes. The sipxbridge.xml generation problem should be > fixed. That's > > the root problem behind XX-4785 right? > > Of course it is just a detail and not the root problem of 4785.. > > I do not recall making the claim that it is the "root problem > behind xx-4785" That was my question. I guess the answer is no? Is there a JIRA covering the sipxbridge.xml generation problem? If not, can you please raise one? Also, is Jason's current XX-4785 solution approach now acceptable to you and Scott for this release? Thanks. -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
