> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:38 AM
> To: Mossman, Paul AVAYA (CAR:9D30)
> Cc: Chu, Xingjun AVAYA (CAR:9D70); Ranganathan, Mudumbai AVAYA
> (CONST:9D30); Lawrence, Scott AVAYA (BL60:9D30); sipx-
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] A proposal regarding model of gateway <->ITSP
> account insipX
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Paul Mossman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ranga wrote:
> >> > In most cases the mapping is 1-1. In the few cases it
> >> isn't 1-1, then
> >> > the admin needs to enter the same ITSP credentials a couple
> >> of extra
> >> > times. Minor inconvenience.
> >>
> >>
> >> I guess it is fine. Not the design I would prefer but we can
> >> revisit the GUI issue later.
> >
> > Agreed then. We'll park it for now.
> >
> >
> >> > Yes. The sipxbridge.xml generation problem should be
> >> fixed. That's
> >> > the root problem behind XX-4785 right?
> >>
> >> Of course it is just a detail and not the root problem of 4785..
> >>
> >> I do not recall making the claim that it is the "root problem
> >> behind xx-4785"
> >
> > That was my question. I guess the answer is no?
> >
>
> It is not.
>
> > Is there a JIRA covering the sipxbridge.xml generation problem? If
> not, can you please raise one?
> >
>
> OK.
>
> >
> > Also, is Jason's current XX-4785 solution approach now acceptable to
> you and Scott for this release?
> >
> >
>
>
> Acceptable if we can resolve the "duplicate ITSP record" problem in
> sipxconfig. That is
>
> 1. Please do not generate duplicates accounts <username,itsp-domain>
> is identical for two ITSP accounts. Instead generate a single account
> record. It is limited but it is an improvement over what we have at
> present.
>
> 2 If two mappings have the same <username,itsp-domain> place the
> line-ids as a set
>
> <line-identifiers>
> <line-id> id1 </line-id>
> <line-id> id2 </line-id>
> </line-identifiers>
Just to minimize any possible churn here, the below is what Scott suggests and
we agree on
<gateways>
<gateway id='a'>
</gateway>
<gateway id='b'>
</gateway>
</gateways>
Thanks
Jason
>
> Or some equivalent well designed xml schema.
>
> 3. If two accounts are defined with the same <username,itsp-domain>
> but different information in other respects, either sipxconfig should
> flag that. It is an invalid configuration.
>
> It is not the best GUI design but will do for now.
>
> I can accept what's on the plate if we can address the above in
> separate critical issues.
>
> Regards
>
> Ranga
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > -Paul
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
