On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Carolyn Beeton <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Beeton, Carolyn AVAYA (CAR:9D60) >> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:30 AM >> To: Mossman, Paul AVAYA (CAR:9D30) >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] XX-7695 , ITSP templates and settings question >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [email protected] >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M. >> > Ranganathan >> > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:36 PM >> > To: Mossman, Paul AVAYA (CAR:9D30) >> > Cc: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] XX-7695 , ITSP templates and >> settings question >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Paul Mossman >> <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > Part of the confusion seems to be that the Gateway >> screen's Address >> > > field default value comes from the ITSP template "domain", >> > and not the >> > > "address". >> > >> > >> > There is no confusion. It should indeed come from the >> template "ITSP >> > domain". In the generated sipxbridge.xml, the domain is >> mandatory for >> > a given ITSP account. Please change the label to "domain" >> if that is >> > causing confusion. >> > >> > > >> >> +1 >> >> On the Gateway screen for a sip trunk, the "Address" label >> should be changed to "Domain". >> >> Carolyn > > After discussions with David, I'm going to retract my vote for this. > > On the Gateway screen, the Address and Port should be the Address and > Port of the Gateway. They should not contain the Domain and Port of the > ITSP at the far end of the Gateway, which is how they are currently > being used for a sipXbridge SBC. I think this is more than a labelling > issue. We can't change Address to Domain because for "normal" Gateways, > this is in fact the Address of the Gateway, not the Domain of what is > beyond the Gateway (which would be programmed into the Gateway itself). > > Unfortunately other than agreeing that the modelling of sipXbridge SBCs > is very confusing, I don't have any concrete suggestions for > improvement.
An address is a domain. Thus if no port is specified, it should be treated like a domain. If a port is specified that is the listening port of the ITSP. This is consistent with how SIP does lookups. Yes its not very clear but it has not caused confusion to users so I do not think we need to fear that it will in the future. > > Carolyn > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
