> -----Original Message----- > From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:20 AM > To: Beeton, Carolyn AVAYA (CAR:9D60) > Cc: Mossman, Paul AVAYA (CAR:9D30); [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] XX-7695 , ITSP templates and settings question > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Carolyn Beeton > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On the Gateway screen, the Address and Port should be the > Address and > > Port of the Gateway. They should not contain the Domain > and Port of > > the ITSP at the far end of the Gateway, which is how they are > > currently being used for a sipXbridge SBC. I think this is > more than > > a labelling issue. We can't change Address to Domain because for > > "normal" Gateways, this is in fact the Address of the > Gateway, not the > > Domain of what is beyond the Gateway (which would be > programmed into the Gateway itself). > > > > Unfortunately other than agreeing that the modelling of sipXbridge > > SBCs is very confusing, I don't have any concrete suggestions for > > improvement. > > > An address is a domain. Thus if no port is specified, it > should be treated like a domain. If a port is specified that > is the listening port of the ITSP. > > This is consistent with how SIP does lookups. Yes its not > very clear but it has not caused confusion to users so I do > not think we need to fear that it will in the future. > >
An address is a domain, but the gateway address should be the gateway domain. We are putting the ITSP domain into the gateway domain field. Carolyn _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
