M. Ranganathan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Paul Mossman <[email protected]> wrote:
Ranga wrote:
...
Sound good?
Yes it sounds fine.
Excellent.
We should also make the ITSP domain name
un-editable in the ITSP configuration screen. That way the
user can only ever enter that in one place - i.e. the gateway
configuration screen.
The domain must be made a required field in the ITSP gateway
configuration.
Just so long as I see that ITSP domain name in the request
URI that gets to sipxbridge, user interface is negotiable.
Can you clarify?
When a call arrives at sipxbridge, I want the domain part of the
request URI to be the ITSP domain, whether an ITSP record for that
domain exists in sipxbridge.xml or not.
We will use these two Gateway fields:
1. "Address" on the Gateway - Configuration (main) screen:
itsp-proxy-domain
2. "ITSP server address" on the Gateway - ITSP Account screen (under
advanced): itsp-proxy-address
The "Address" is already required, since it cannot be blank.
The ITSP server address can be left blank. Usually only the ITSP proxy
domain is needed.
As far as I know what you have today in 4.0.4 is the same as what you
are describing above. What is the change ( or have I missed something)
?
The changes will be the following (and they will solve this issue - the
configuration test failed problem) :
1. For forwardingrules.xml generation: Start using the 'address' value from the
'gateway' DB table.
2. For sipxbridge.xml generation: itsp-proxy-domain: Start using the 'address'
value from the 'gateway' DB table.
Ranga.
Are there currently two places where either of these settings can be
entered?
Yes.
-Paul
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
