Ranga wrote:
...
> Let us not change things for now even if it is not consistent
> with the way other gateways are configured.
The UI needs improvement. But I agree, a re-structure is too much to
bite off at this point in the 4.2 release.
So to fix the larger problem of the configured values being ignored
(including XX-7695):
1. For forwardingrules.xml generation: Start using the 'address' value
from the 'gateway' DB table.
2. For sipxbridge.xml generation:
itsp-proxy-domain: Start using the 'address' value from the
'gateway' DB table.
itsp-proxy-address: Start using the "settings" value. (i.e. The
"itsp-account/itsp-proxy-address" path value in the 'setting_value',
when not default.)
3. Remove the "please.contact.att" <itsp-proxy-domain> value from the
att.xml template.
Note that the default Gateway Address value will be taken from the ITSP
template (<itsp-proxy-domain>), if a value is specified. But in either
case, sipXconfig will not create a Gateway with a blank Address.
Sound good?
-Paul
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
