On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Andy Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Woof! > > On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:07:42 -0400, M. Ranganathan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It should be pretty easy to implement this. Any opinions? > > Please measure the system load while 1000 simultaneous zip/unzip operations > are running in 1000 different threads.
Can be done in the background when system load is low by a low priority thread. > > If you are comfortable that this load will not effect the ability to handle > calls, then by all means go for it. > > Of course, perhaps the new management has some more realistic views than the > previous management over how many simultaneous IVR calls the system is > actually expected to handle. ;-) > > But currently storage space is way cheaper than CPU cycles, so what is > driving this request? The size of wav files is pretty huge. I fear that disk space will fill up fairly quick. On hosted systems ( such as on a cloud ) this could effect the hosting costs. CPU could become a bottleneck only when system load is high hence the suggestion to run it in a low priority thread. Besides, you do not need to unzip it on the server. The client can unzip. Ranga > > --Woof! > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
