>
>
>Woof!
>
>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:34:11 -0400, M. Ranganathan <[email protected]>  
>wrote:
>
>> Can be done in the background when system load is low by a low priority  
>> thread.
>
>Well, zipping (or MP3 encoding) could be.  But what about when someone  
>calls in to check their messages?  The unzipping/MP3 decoding must be done

>in realtime, on demand, and on the server.
>
>I agree with Tony's argument for MP3 when sent via e-mail or downloaded  
> from the user portal.  But even if sipX did MP3 encoding for this purpose,

>I'd suggest keeping the original linear files around for when users are  
>retrieving messages via the telephone to avoid the need to decode in  
>realtime.

+1.  Performance is more important than disk space.

>
>Is anyone out there running a 'large' sipX/SCS system willing to publish  
>their voicemail usage specs?  I'd love to see the average number of  
>messages per mailbox, and the average length of each message, and the  
>total disk space used by voicemail.  Every system I've ever looked at was  
>using a tiny fraction of the disk space for voicemail.  Average message  
>length was under 30 seconds.  Logs were taking up WAY more space then  
>voicemail ever did.
>
>And for the record, I think sipX should support MP3, but only when someone

>finds a way around the licensing issues.

Can we detect if lame is installed and if so use it, otherwise no?
--martin

>
>--Woof!


_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to