Correct Douglas, the idea is not to alienate users of other systems by any means, but it must be understood that advanced DNS dependent features will depend on BIND. Windows DNS simply does not support these advanced features so it should be understood that if you want to do branch survivability you can't use Windows DNS and expect it to work.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Nathaniel Watkins > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I may be in the minority on this group...however... > > > > I would guess that many organizations already have a solid windows based > DNS/active directory setup. I have a total of one linux box on my network - > while it may be my favorite box...I need sipXecs/phones/gatways/etc. to be a > part of my network - not the other way around. So I think whatever the > solution, it needs to work with the DHCP/DNS provider of my choice... > > > > I don't want to manage 2 sets of books... > > I think DNS views would only be for those wishing to implementing > branch survivability. You can still have single and HA as a cluster. > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > -- Josh Patten eZuce Solutions Architect O.978-296-1005 X2050 M.979-574-5699
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
