Can somebody generate a blackhole hold involving sipXbridge and produce a snapshot in a tracker? I am curious what happens with the MoH routing. Perhaps there is some magic we can do which we are missing.

On 06/22/2011 08:31 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
it's worth asking :-)

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I dont think thats even possibly tenable even if we pull
    everyone's hair off.   0.0.0.0 reaching FS (the MoH) server,
    without any divine intervention will not figure out where to send
    the cool guitar strum music.


    On 06/22/2011 07:44 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
    Would it be easy to support it in FS instead of in sipXbridge?
     That way multiple MoH standards can be used and the caller
    doesn't need to be coming through sipXbridge...

    Mike

    On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        congratulations :-)

        On 06/22/2011 07:24 PM, Venkateshwaran T wrote:
        > Hi Joegen,
        >    I tried with removing the MOH uri for one user and
        enabled the RFC
        > 2543 at this time I can see c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 in SDP
        >
        > Regards,
        > Kumaran T
        >
        >
        > Joegen Baclor wrote:
        >>
        >> I'll have seconds thoughts about this.  Probably, the best
        way we can
        >> do about this is to correct the SDP in the sipx bridge and
        hope for
        >> the best.  But we really cannot be sure if a UA sending
        0.0.0.0
        >> really means it (meaning I have both send and receive
        closed, don't
        >> even try) or go ahead and try sending, I'm going to accept
        it because
        >> I lied.   I really meant a=recvonly and not a=inactive.
        >>
        >>
        >> On 06/22/2011 06:27 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
        >>> This makes me think if we have a really funky requirement
        for support
        >>> moh (lots of old clunky cisco phones, for example)...
        >>>
        >>> phone group>line>registration
        >>>
        >>> where we can have a moh uri that essentially uses or
        allows 0.0.0.0,
        >>> which would possibly be a way to support phones that are
        crappy. I'm
        >>> not sure it is worth it, but I feel like FS can probably
        mimic it
        >>> somehow.
        >>>
        >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Tony Graziano
        >>> <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
        >>>> the phone has a moh uri, which can be deleted at the
        line level:
        >>>>
        >>>> Phone>Line>registration>
        >>>>
        >>>> musicOnHold.uri          (Default: ~~mh~@sipdomain)
        >>>>
        >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:12 AM,
        >>>> Kumaran<[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
        >>>>> Hi Joegen,
        >>>>>      We can disable in Feature->MOH->None.I'm I right?
        >>>>>
        >>>>> Regards,
        >>>>> Kumaran T
        >>>>>
        >>>>> Kumaran wrote:
        >>>>>> Joegen
        >>>>>>   Can you please tell me how to disable the MOH?
        >>>>>> Thanks
        >>>>>>
        >>>>>> Joegen Baclor wrote:
        >>>>>>> What I am saying is you need to disable MoH for you
        to see
        >>>>>>> this.  MoH
        >>>>>>> and 2543 hold cannot co-exist.
        >>>>>>>
        >>>>>>> On 06/22/2011 05:31 PM, Kumaran wrote:
        >>>>>>>> Hi Joegen,
        >>>>>>>>    I tried on Polycom 550..I enabled for 2 users 200 and
        >>>>>>>> 123.Thats I
        >>>>>>>> posted which are Polycom models supported...
        >>>>>>>> 200 calls 123
        >>>>>>>> 123 answer the call
        >>>>>>>> 200 Put on Hold and then Resume the call
        >>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>> Regards,
        >>>>>>>> Kumaran T
        >>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>> Joegen Baclor wrote:
        >>>>>>>>> You have configured moh in the polycom.  As I've
        said in another
        >>>>>>>>> mail, 2543 hold is cont compatible with MoH.  My
        bet is Polycom
        >>>>>>>>> ignores this flag if MoH is set.   Tony?
        >>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>> On 06/22/2011 05:17 PM, Kumaran wrote:
        >>>>>>>>>> Hi Tony,
        >>>>>>>>>>       Please check my SipXproxy.log.By
        <http://SipXproxy.log.By> default,it will
        >>>>>>>>>> unchecked in
        >>>>>>>>>> Devices->Phones->Sip.So enabled it to check the
        SDP part whether
        >>>>>>>>>> its reflecting  or not.But I never I find
        c=0.0.0.0 in SDP part
        >>>>>>>>>> after putting on HOLD.Its only showing IP address
        of the phone.
        >>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
        >>>>>>>>>> Kumaran T
        >>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>> Tony Graziano wrote:
        >>>>>>>>>>> all.
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>> SIP>protocol
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>> useRFC2543hold         (Default: unchecked)
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>> If checked, use the obsolete c=0.0.0.0 RFC2543
        technique,
        >>>>>>>>>>> otherwise,
        >>>>>>>>>>> use SDP media direction attributes (such as
        a=sendonly) per
        >>>>>>>>>>> RFC 3264
        >>>>>>>>>>> when initiating hold. In either case, the phone
        processes
        >>>>>>>>>>> incoming
        >>>>>>>>>>> hold signaling in either format.
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>> However that is simply the interaction of the
        hold button,
        >>>>>>>>>>> and I
        >>>>>>>>>>> don't
        >>>>>>>>>>> think it substitutes the MOH uri for services
        within sipx, etc.
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Kumaran
        >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
        >>>>>>>>>>>>     What are the Polycom models supports RFC
        2543 Hold?
        >>>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
        >>>>>>>>>>>> Kumaran T
        >>>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
        >>>>>>>>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
        >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        >>>>>>>>>>>> List Archive:
        http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
        >>>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
        >>>>>>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
        >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        >>>>>>>>>> List Archive:
        http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
        >>>>>>>>
        >>>>>>
        >>>>> _______________________________________________
        >>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
        >>>>> [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        >>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
        >>>>>
        >>>>
        >>>>
        >>>> --
        >>>> ======================
        >>>> Tony Graziano, Manager
        >>>> Telephone: 434.984.8430 <tel:434.984.8430>
        >>>> sip: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        >>>> Fax: 434.326.5325 <tel:434.326.5325>
        >>>>
        >>>> Email: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        >>>>
        >>>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
        >>>> Telephone: 434.984.8426 <tel:434.984.8426>
        >>>> sip: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        >>>>
        >>>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
        >>>> http://support.myitdepartment.net
        >>>> Blog:
        >>>> http://blog.myitdepartment.net
        >>>>
        >>>> Linked-In Profile:
        >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
        >>>>
        >>>
        >>>
        >
        >

        _______________________________________________
        sipx-dev mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/




-- Michael Picher
    eZuce
    Director of Technical Services
    O.978-296-1005 X2015 <tel:978-296-1005%20X2015>
    M.207-956-0262 <tel:207-956-0262>
    @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
    www.ezuce.com <http://www.ezuce.com>


    _______________________________________________
    sipx-dev mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    List Archive:http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/




--
Michael Picher
eZuce
Director of Technical Services
O.978-296-1005 X2015
M.207-956-0262
@mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
www.ezuce.com <http://www.ezuce.com>


_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to